Saab Bio Power

An Environmental Blog

welcome to Saabbio Power

A Beautiful Environment Blog

Tree Service

Posted on by Robert Larson

The Walker’s Tree Service is a family-owned and operated company that has been in the business of trees for more than 35 years. This company prides itself on working closely with its customers, providing a high level of customer service in a fun atmosphere. They pride themselves on providing a diverse range of services, including tree removal and trimming, tree pruning, tree trimming, stump removal, tree and shrub removal, and other services related to trees. This is just a small portion of what they offer.

When a customer becomes a customer of Walker’s Tree Service, they are provided with information on how to care for their trees and bushes, what to do if a tree becomes damaged, and other helpful tips. They are also provided with information about landscaping, tree removal and disposal, tree diseases, pest control, trees that have been damaged or cut down, and tree maintenance. If you are interested in learning more about these services or in becoming a customer, visit Walker’s website today. If you have any questions, visit their phone number or speak with a customer representative today.

Trees are essential for our beauty and way of life. As we continue to age, we will need to replace some of our trees. If you have an empty lot, are in the market for a tree, or have just purchased your first house, you should consider hiring a tree service. Walker’s Tree Service is one such company that offers a wide range of services related to trees. Their motto is “We’re here to help you love your trees.” If you would like to learn more about this wonderful and helpful company, visit the website listed below for additional information.

Best SEO Services for Environment

Posted on by Robert Larson

The best SEO services for environment are critical because your site should be visible to targeted visitors. Visibility is the first and foremost requirement of search engine optimization (SEO). If your website is not visible to the targeted visitors then your business will not grow and productivity will go down. You cannot afford to have a non-targeted traffic on your site. If your website is not visible then your business will end up losing money. This is the reason why most of the business owners to restrict their SEO strategy to organic strategies.

SEO Company in Delhi | Best SEO services in Delhi NCR

Optimizing your web site for the environment can help you achieve more. Today, you can opt for the best seo services for environment which ensure your website is easy to read, easy to navigate, and easy to follow. These services will provide you a complete page ranking report that will enable you to understand your position in the search engines. This is the best way to get your page rank as high as possible.

You should choose the best web design savannah services for environment which can provide the best user experience. It should not only be good looking but also provide a great user experience, so that the users will keep coming back to your page. If it does not provide a great user experience then why should they come back to your page? This is the reason why your website should be user-friendly. It should be search engine friendly. A complete page ranking report provides all the information you need to know about your web site including various reports about its performance.

If you use best seo services for environment then it means that you will get the best listings for your keywords. This is the only way to ensure that your website appears at the top of the search engines. The best thing is that the results provided by the search engine will be accurate and will show the right location of your website at the top of the list. However, if your keywords are not listed in the first 10 then it is advisable to use best SEO services for environment so that you can increase the traffic. If your website is popular then it is likely to appear at the top of the rankings and this would increase the number of visitors.

Choosing the best SEO services for environment is not easy and you will have to do some research and spend some time before you find the best service provider. If you use cheap services then you can never be sure of what you are paying for. It is advisable to choose a reputable SEO company that provides affordable best services for environment. It is best to choose a company that uses the latest tools and techniques in order to provide the best services for your business website.

There are many people who believe that it is not necessary to use the best SEO services for environment in order to improve your website rank. It is not true; if you are careful and research well you will find the best SEO Company for your business website. It is advisable to make a proper list of all the companies which are providing the best SEO services for environment in your city so that you can compare them. A good SEO company should have proper knowledge about the localities where they offer the best SEO services for your business website. Thus, it is important to choose the best seo services for environment so that your company website can get more customers.

Landscaping Can Add Lots of Character to Your Home

Posted on by Robert Larson

Landscaping is an important part of home ownership. For one thing, it is a great way to enhance the appearance of your home by making it look more attractive. When you choose to put in new landscaping, you can add curb appeal to your property and bring it to a whole new level. For example, if you want to make improvements on your home but don’t have the money to spend on professional Brisbane Landscaper, you may want to think about planting trees and flowers on your own or you can hire someone to come in and do the work for you. Either way, landscaping can be a fantastic way to bring a different look to your home.

After all, most people who live in a city or town like the idea of having a nice, peaceful and welcoming look for their homes, whether it’s a small apartment or a large one.Landscaping is a term that has many different connotations. It could refer to the aesthetic aspect of your home, it could even refer to what goes on around your house. Landscaping also refers to an activity which alters the structure of an outdoor area, including: adding landscape architecture, creating new landscape features and landscapes, and making your lawn or garden more visually appealing. While some people consider it to be somewhat of a hobby or art, others would find it more appropriate for a home owner to create his or her own personal landscape from scratch.

While landscaping isn’t really much different than designing your own home or backyard, there are some major differences between the two. One of the biggest differences between them is the amount of time and money that you’ll need to invest into the task. If you have enough money, landscaping may be an excellent way to increase the value of your home and give it a better look.

What is the Importance of Tree Management Companies?

Posted on by Robert Larson

Tree management companies

The tree management firms use specialized services related to trees including tree pruning, stump removal, plant removal, tree removal of large trees, stump removal, root pruning, and cutting tree branches. The trained tree experts provide special services to commercial buildings as well as residential homes. They have trained and experienced arborists who are capable and skilled enough to safely cut down large trees and remove the stump completely. The tree management company carry out their work by cutting a tree from its root and then breaking the stem at the top, leaving it ready for the next service. Once the stump is removed, the specialist firm removes the roots and leaves of the tree which are all important for the plant’s health.

Some companies take on the responsibility of removing trees for public places like parks, plazas, roadsides and other public places. In this case the firm will also handle the maintenance of the plants, which are also considered to be a part of the tree. They also use chemicals which are effective in the killing of insects which may cause damage to the plants. The companies also remove the dead leaves and other debris on the ground to reduce the amount of soil moisture.

Tree specialists are also responsible for planting trees on foundations. This will reduce the risk of landslides and other structural defects that can cause severe structural damage to structures. They also help to save time when it comes to maintenance of the plants which can also help to save money. Planting trees can also help to improve the aesthetics of the surroundings and thus improving the value of the surrounding property. In order to maintain the trees as well as the plants themselves they also provide annual services like tree pruning and tree maintenance. It is also important for them to provide services related to erosion control and maintenance of roads as well as drainage and water drainage systems.

According to the study, new EU climate targets for 2030 can only be achieved with great difficulty

Posted on by Robert Larson

The tightening of the EU climate targets would lead to a drastic change in energy and transport, according to a new study. But it could be implemented.

According to a study, the considered tightening of the EU climate target for 2030 means a drastic change in energy and transport. In ten years’ time, 60 to 88 percent of all new cars would have to drive without climate-damaging emissions if the European Union wanted to reduce its greenhouse gases by 55 percent compared to 1990, according to the study commissioned by the European Climate Foundation.

With a climate target of minus 65 percent, it would be 93 percent climate-friendly new cars. Great efforts would also be required in buildings, factories, power plants and agriculture for both scenarios.

So far, the EU has set itself the goal of reducing greenhouse gases by 40 percent in 2030 compared to 1990. The value is to be tightened this year. The EU Commission is aiming for a new target of minus 50 to 55 percent. In the EU Parliament, up to 65 percent are up for debate in order to achieve the goals of the Paris Climate Agreement.

The study published on Monday systematically examines the feasibility of a 55 and a 65 percent target and comes to the conclusion: Both would be feasible. There are two variants of the 55 percent target – one that relies on the very rapid use of new technologies, and one that expects a considerable change in behavior on the part of citizens. A 65 percent target would have to combine both.

In both cases, major changes are due. Examples: The generation of electricity from coal would have to be reduced from the last 470 terawatt hours at the 55 percent target to a maximum of 50 terawatt hours by 2030, and only to 25 for the 65 percent target. Every year, 2.3 to 3.5 percent would have to be reduced the residential buildings are modernized so extensively that around 80 percent less energy is then required. Meat consumption should decrease by eleven to 30 percent.

The EU Commission is working on its own impact analysis, which should be available in September. This is followed by a proposal for the new climate target, on which the EU states and the EU Parliament would have to agree.

Record increase in greenhouse gas concentration

Posted on by Robert Larson

The concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere has never risen as quickly as it did last year. The reasons: human activity, the El Niño weather phenomenon and droughts in the tropics.

GenevaAccording to measurements by climatologists, the greenhouse gas concentration in the atmosphere has never risen as quickly as it did last year. In addition to the activities of the people, this was also due to the El Niño weather phenomenon with its increased ocean temperatures and droughts in the tropics, as the World Weather Organization (WMO) reported in Geneva on Monday. As a result, oceans and forests, for example, could not absorb as much climate-damaging carbon dioxide (CO2) as in other years.

The new WMO greenhouse gas bulletin, together with the report of the UN Environment Program (UNEP) planned for Tuesday on progress in reducing greenhouse gases, will serve as the basis for the climate conference in Bonn from November 6th. Unep’s “Emissions Gap Report” shows what the world’s population still has to do to limit global warming to below two degrees by the end of the century, as laid down in the Paris World Climate Agreement.

WMO General Secretary Petteri Taalas sounded the alarm: “Without rapid cuts in CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions, we will be heading for dangerous increases in temperature by the end of the century that are well above the goals of the Paris Agreement. Future generations will inherit a much more inhospitable planet. “

According to the WMO, the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere was 403.3 parts per million particles (ppm), compared to 400 ppm in the previous year. The most recent growth record of well below 2 ppm came from 2013. In 1996 the concentration was only 362 ppm. The US climate agency NOAA reported a CO2 concentration of 402.9 ppm for the past year. The WMO would take measurements from twice as many stations as the NOAA, said WMO climate researcher Oksana Tarasova.

Until the beginning of industrialization around 1750, the concentration remained below 280 ppm for at least 800,000 years, the report says. This is proven by ice drilling, in which correspondingly old air bubbles were discovered, which made it possible to measure the concentration at that time. After analyzing fossils, researchers estimate that there was a CO2 concentration as high as it was three to five million years ago. It was two to three degrees warmer. The ice in Greenland and West Antarctica has melted and the sea level has been 10 to 20 meters higher.

If the CO2 level continues to rise rapidly, this can trigger unprecedented climate changes, with “serious ecological and economic disruptions,” warns the WMO. In addition to population growth, more intensive agriculture and deforestation, industrialization and the associated use of fossil fuels contribute to high greenhouse gas concentrations.

CO2 is the most important long-lived greenhouse gas: the combustion of coal, oil and gas, cement production and other industrial processes cause around 70 percent of all greenhouse gas emissions. According to the report, the CO2 concentration was 145 percent compared to the pre-industrial level in 2016, the second most important greenhouse gas methane was 257 percent and the third most important, nitrous oxide (laughing gas), 122 percent.

Global CO2 emissions have remained practically at the same level over the past three years. But the concentration in the atmosphere increases even if the emissions remain high. Around a quarter of the CO2 emitted is currently absorbed by the oceans, which become more acidic. Another quarter stores the biosphere, for example trees and soil. The rest ends up in the atmosphere. The radiative forcing, which measures the climate-relevant effects of greenhouse gases, has increased by 40 percent since 1990, of which by 2.5 percent in 2016 alone, according to the report. CO2 is responsible for 80 percent of the increase since 1990.

Climate change is already affecting health

Posted on by Robert Larson

The CO2 concentration is increasing at record speed. Emissions must be reduced more massively than planned in order to avert a climate catastrophe – and the heat is already affecting many people’s health today.

Shortly before the world climate conference in Bonn, UN organizations, doctors and economists sound the alarm. The concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere has increased faster than ever before. Climate change is already damaging the health of many people. In addition, the countries would have to do a lot more than previously planned to avert a climate collapse. These are the facts for the World Climate Conference in Bonn, which begins next Monday.

Even if all the climate protection commitments made so far by the countries are adhered to, the temperature of the earth will increase by at least three degrees compared to the time before industrialization, according to the UN Environment Program (UNEP). The program presented this admonishing interim report on Tuesday in Geneva. In the Paris Agreement, the states agreed to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees if possible, but in any case to well below 2 degrees.

According to the World Weather Organization (WMO), it is already 1.2 degrees warmer on earth. The two-degree target is considered the ultimate limit to avert catastrophic climate impacts. Many researchers warn of barely tolerable consequences for mankind even at plus 1.5 degrees: melting of the ice caps, rising sea levels, more extreme weather conditions. “There is an urgent need to accelerate the short-term measures and to make the long-term goals more ambitious,” says the Unep report. The states’ climate targets would only result in a third of the emission reductions that would be necessary by 2030 to avoid the worst consequences of global warming.

What effects climate change is already having

Although the set climate targets will not be enough by 2030, there is a ray of hope: The global emissions of the most important greenhouse gas CO2 of 35.8 Gt have remained relatively stable over the past three years. Part of the stabilization comes from the expansion of renewable energies, especially in China and India. However, if coal-fired power plants were built, emissions could quickly rise again.

The Unep report also shows specific ways in which countries can save CO2 at low cost. Renewable energies, more energy efficiency, afforestation and avoidance of forest destruction could be implemented at low costs or even bring profits.

Even if the emission of CO2 remains stable, its concentration in the atmosphere is increasing – in 2016 faster than ever before. In addition to the activities of the people, this was also due to the El Niño weather phenomenon with its increased ocean temperatures and droughts in the tropics, as the World Weather Organization (WMO) reported in Geneva on Monday. As a result, oceans and plants could not absorb as much CO2 as in previous years.

Climate protection is displacing nature conservation

Posted on by Robert Larson

By fixating on climate protection and phasing out coal, politicians and ecologists are neglecting specific nature conservation. Saving the world has priority.

Now finally some of the big players came to Bonn for the World Climate Conference on Wednesday: Angela Merkel and Emmanuel Macron. In the past few days, it was mainly non-governmental organizations that had dominated the reporting: with rankings such as the “Climate Protection Index” from Germanwatch and, above all, with campaigns against open-cast lignite mining in the Garzweiler district, not too far from Bonn, that can be easily photographed.

After Merkel’s speech, the activists can feel like winners: The Chancellor made it clear that she wants to significantly reduce the use of coal to generate electricity in Germany. After all, it is a “question of fate for humanity”.

The annual world climate conferences are no longer just a scientific and political forum for the formulation of international agreements. They have become a public stage on which the rulers can propagate their will to solve global problems and the booming industry of NGOs can market itself.

There is no question about it: the evidence for anthropogenic – that is, caused by human production and consumption – climate change is convincing. Unfortunately, as Donald Trump and many of the new populist parties in Europe suggest, the change in the global climate is not a conspiratorial invention.

Nevertheless, the increasing fixation of activists and politicians on the coal phase-out and climate protection must be viewed critically. Because climate protection alone does not replace nature conservation. The preservation of biological diversity, natural habitats and landscapes, forests and wild animals has gotten out of the focus of public attention and thus also of politics due to the fixation on the climate. Climate change plays a rather subordinate role in the loss of nature or the extinction of species. On the IUCN ranking of the causes of species extinction, warming comes in seventh place. Land grabbing through the expansion of settlement and economic areas, industrialized agriculture and the use of pesticides has much more devastating effects.

Ironically, the expansion of so-called renewable energies in the service of climate protection, not least the particularly space-intensive expansion of wind and solar power plants, counteracts the goals of the national biodiversity strategy in Germany. Because during the energy transition it was neglected to set load limits for species, forests and landscapes. These pressures affect not only animals, but also people: In Germany, you can hardly go for a walk in the forest

Too much meat consumption, too much clearing – Climate Council presents report

Posted on by Robert Larson

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change will publish a special report on Thursday. In focus: climate change and land use. But the report could also contain a sharp warning to the world’s population.

GenevaAround 820 million people worldwide are undernourished. On the other hand, there is very high meat consumption that uses up a lot of land and a lot of food is simply thrown away. Providing the growing world population with adequate food in an equitable manner is a daunting challenge – and it is getting worse with climate change. Agriculture needs land, but at the same time many forests are necessary because they store the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide. “Food security and the protection of forests should be non-negotiable,” says Charlotte Streck, co-founder of the think tank Climate Focus. A contradiction?

No, says Streck, the either-or game bothers them. Both are possible. From their point of view the most important levers: reduce meat consumption and accelerate the phase-out from fossil fuels. “Beef is particularly resource-intensive. It takes 20 times as much land and produces 20 times as many greenhouse gases per gram of edible protein than vegetable proteins, for example from beans, peas or lentils, ”explains Streck. And land is a limited resource. In addition, according to the World Food and Agriculture Organization FAO, a third of all food is thrown away worldwide.

In all likelihood, these facts will also be made clear in the special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which will be published in Geneva on Thursday and which will primarily deal with land use and climate change.

In Germany, shortly before the publication of the special report, there is a discussion about whether meat should be taxed higher in future. The Greens expert Friedrich Ostendorff spoke out in favor of an increase in VAT from 7 to 19 percent, criticism came from farmers and consumer advocates. The federal government reacted cautiously. The German Animal Welfare Association brought up the topic. As the Federal Statistical Office announced on Wednesday, slaughterhouses in Germany produced 2.6 percent less meat in the first half of the current year. According to the statistics bureau, 29.4 million pigs, cattle, sheep, goats and horses were slaughtered in the first six months of the year.

Despite this small success for climate protectors in Germany: The IPCC special report could contain a sharp warning to the world population, politics and the economy. “At a time when we can least afford it, we are losing fertile soil and biological diversity at an alarming rate,” said the managing director of the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), Inger Andersen, on Friday at the opening of the multi-day event IPCC meeting. “We have to adapt the use of our land to climate change so that we can secure food production for present and future generations.”

A large international team of researchers has carried out a very extensive analysis of the current global level of knowledge on these topics for the IPCC in recent years. Since Friday, delegates from the IPCC member countries have been meeting in Geneva to discuss the summary of the analysis. The IPCC plans to present the resulting report on Thursday. The one-week procedure is intended to ensure that the IPCC special report is also recognized by the member countries.

Expert Streck already sees the fact that the role of forests and agriculture is being discussed as a great success. “The topic affects us directly, we see burning forests, a lot of pest infestation. The forest quality is also going downhill for us, ”says Streck, who believes that there is a lot of potential for phasing out fossil fuels.

“The climate models are getting wilder and wilder if we stick to fossil fuels and have to designate more and more reforestation areas as compensation.” An end to fossil fuels would therefore take a lot of pressure off the debate about possible land conflicts. According to the latest IPCC report on the 1.5 degree target, global emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) would have to fall by 45 percent between 2010 and 2030 and reach zero in 2050.

In addition to sustainable land management, topics such as droughts, desertification, heat waves and floods will play a role in the report. The chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Hoesung Lee, emphasized last Friday above all the symbolic effect on the public that the report could send. “I hope that we can raise people’s awareness of the dangers and challenges that climate change poses for the land we live on and that feed us.”

More : Norway wants to press carbon dioxide into old oil and gas fields and thus fight climate change. However, the technology used is controversial.

Higher CO2 prices for green economic miracle

Posted on by Robert Larson

The EU wants to impose a sustainability scheme on asset managers. The money industry is already preparing. Stanislaus von Thurn und Taxis for the benefit of the climate protests and setting the course for politics.

Stanislaus Prinz von Thurn und Taxis (32) recently became Head of Sustainability Research (ESG) at asset manager Flossbach von Storch AG in Cologne. He started there in 2017 as an equity analyst after working for a London hedge fund and the German private bank Berenberg. The economist studied in Maastricht, Prague and London.

WirtschaftsWoche: Prinz von Thurn und Taxis, do your fund manager colleagues at Flossbach von Storch have to change a lot in the depots in order to take greater account of the risk of climate change?
Von Thurn und Taxis: Sustainability is not new to us, it has always been part of our investment process. Therefore, the topic is already reflected in our portfolios. A company can only be sustainably successful if it serves its customers properly, motivates its employees, treats its business partners fairly, invests adequately, pays taxes and does not cause any environmental damage. In addition to good corporate governance, ecological and social issues are prerequisites for long-term economic success. One cannot be done without the other.

According to the will of the EU, companies with more than 500 employees should in future indicate to what extent their activities fit into one of three categories for sustainable investments: “green”, “enabling” and “transition” are available. Does this help fund managers?
The primary concern should be to ensure that the sustainability data is also reliable. The form in which this is implemented is of secondary importance to us. The fact that transparency is to be increased is definitely a step in the right direction. But I would at least question whether one is doing oneself a favor with terms such as “green”, “enabling” and “transition”, that is, an express assessment. Not a single ton of CO2 should be saved just because something falls into the “transition” pot. That would require a consensus in society as a whole.

Aren’t money managers too narrowed down when politicians give them strict requirements for a sustainability scheme? Do you expect a loss of return?
No, neither one nor the other. Since the taxonomy should expressly not prescribe where one can invest and where not, we reserve the right to deviate from the static classification if our analysis comes to a different conclusion. Our hope is that the taxonomy will at least lead to companies issuing more and better information on sustainability and thus making it easier for us to analyze the respective companies – and that it will put a stop to “greenwashing” in the fund industry. This would protect investors from sham packaging that says “sustainable” on it, but does not contain any of it.

Has your stance on the topic of climate change and sustainability changed much with the protests of climate protection activist Greta Thunberg and the “Fridays for Future” movement?
Greta Thunberg’s protest is important, but the right conclusions should be drawn from it. Politicians should have the courage to use intelligent incentive systems to promote climate-friendly economic activity and consumption and, conversely, to punish pollution of the environment. A higher CO2 pricing, for example, would be more productive than a pure ban policy, as it stimulates innovations and the development of new technologies without patronizing the citizens. It could even contribute to a green economic miracle, a kind of “Green New Deal”, if it were done right and steered the energy of scientists, entrepreneurs and engineers in the right direction.

You have received a lot of awards for your funds, but a sustainability seal is not one of them. Will that change?
We are basically not interested in awards or seals. We will remain true to our investment strategy, which explicitly includes ESG factors in the analysis process.

ESG stands for environment, social and good corporate governance, or in English: environment, social and governance. Why are these factors important?
We are convinced that this strategy not only delivers added value for our investors, but also benefits all stakeholders in the companies in which we are involved. In the end, that should also be recognized – with or without a seal.

Can you rely on the data provided by companies on sustainability and the climate?
No, not yet. For a proper company analysis that also integrates sustainability factors, we not only need more, but above all better data than the one previously provided. The fact that there has not yet been a reporting standard that prescribes what and how it is published appropriately has led to a confusing jumble of data that is sometimes hardly comparable. The template-like ESG ratings derived from this therefore only help us to a limited extent. You can point out one or the other critical point, but nothing more. As an investor, you cannot avoid your own analysis.

All Rights Reserved by Saab Bio Power